

Jaume Masip, Ph.D.
Jaume Masip's research focuses on the verbal and nonverbal detection of deception. Among several other issues, he has explored:
- Police officers’ lie-detection accuracy and biases, as well as the strategies officers use when judging veracity.
- Beliefs about deception cues.
- Judgmental biases in judging veracity caused by deception-detection training.
- The impact of facial appearance on truthfulness attributions.
- Linguistic (e.g., using LIWC) and verbal (e.g., CBCA, RM, ARJS) cues to deception.
- Non-behavioral indicators of deception.
- The Behavior Analysis Interview (BAI).
- Liars’ strategies to be convincing.
- Interviewing to detect deception.
- Cognitive models of deception, and theroretical perspectives on lie detection.
- How people detect lies in everyday life.
Jaume Masip is teaching "Psychology and Law" and "Criminal Psychology" at the University of Salamanca (Spain).
Primary Interests:
- Applied Social Psychology
- Communication, Language
- Law and Public Policy
- Nonverbal Behavior
- Person Perception
- Persuasion, Social Influence
- Social Cognition
Note from the Network: The holder of this profile has certified having all necessary rights, licenses, and authorization to post the files listed below. Visitors are welcome to copy or use any files for noncommercial or journalistic purposes provided they credit the profile holder and cite this page as the source.
Image Gallery

Journal Articles:
- Blandón-Gitlin, I., Fenn, E., Masip, J., & Yoo, A. (2014). Cognitive-load approaches to detect deception: Searching for cognitive mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 441-444. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.004
- Bond, C. F., Howard, A. R., Hutchison, J. L., & Masip, J. (2013). Overlooking the obvious: Incentives to lie. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 212-221. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2013.764302
- Denault, V., Plusquellec, P., Jupe, L. M., St-Yves, M., Dunbar, N. E., Hartwig, M., et al. (2020). The analysis of nonverbal communication: The dangers of pseudoscience in security and justice contexts. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 30, 1-12. doi:10.5093/apj2019a9
- Garrido, E., Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2004). Police officers’ credibility judgments: Accuracy and estimated ability. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 254-275. doi: 10.1080/00207590344000411
- Hauch, V., Blandón-Gitlin, I., Masip, J., & Sporer, S. L. (2015). Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 307-342. doi: 10.1177/1088868314556539
- Hauch, V., Sporer, S. L., Masip, J., & Blandón-Gitlin, I. (2017). Can credibility criteria be assessed reliably? A meta-analysis of Criteria-based Content Analysis. Psychological Assessment, 29, 819-834. doi:10.1037/pas0000426
- Masip, J. (2017). Deception detection: State of the art and future prospects. Psicothema, 29, 149-159. doi:10.7334/psicothema2017.34
- Masip, J., Alonso, H., Garrido, E., & Antón, C. (2005). Generalized Communicative Suspicion (GCS) among police officers: Accounting for the investigator bias effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1046-1066. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02159.x
- Masip, J., Alonso, H., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2009) Training to detect what? The biasing effects of training on veracity judgments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1282-1269. doi: 10.1002/acp.1535
- Masip, J., Alonso, H., Herrero, C., & Garrido, E. (2016). Experienced and novice officers’ Generalized Communication Suspicion and veracity judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 169-181. doi:10.1037/lhb0000169
- Masip, J., Bethencourt, M., Lucas, G., Sánchez-San Segundo, M., & Herrero, C. (2012). Deception detection from written accounts. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 103-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00931.x
- Masip, J., Blandón-Gitlin, I., Martínez, C., Herrero, C., & Ibabe, I. (2016). Strategic interviewing to detect deception: Cues to deception across repeated interviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1702. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01702
- Masip, J., Blandón-Gitlin, I., de la Riva, C., & Herrero, C. (2016). An empirical test of the decision to lie component of the Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory (ADCAT). Acta Psychologica, 169, 45-55. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.004
- Masip, J., & Garrido, E. (2001). Is there a kernel of truth in judgements of deceptiveness? Anales de Psicología, 17, 101-120.
- Masip, J., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2009). Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: Questioning the truth bias. Psychological Reports, 105, 11-36. doi: 10.2466/pr0.105.1.11-36
- Masip, J., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2004). Facial appearance and impressions of credibility: The effects of facial babyishness and age on person perception. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 276-289. doi: 10.1080/00207590444000014
- Masip, J., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2003). Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: The effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 269-311.
- Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2017). Examining police officers’ response bias in judging veracity. Psicothema, 29, 490-495. doi:10.7334/psicothema2016.357
- Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2015). Police detection of deception: Beliefs about behavioral cues to deception are strong even though contextual evidence is more useful. Journal of Communication, 65, 125-145. doi:10.1111/jcom.12135
- Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2013). “What would you say if you were guilty?” Suspects’ strategies during a hypothetical Behavior Analysis Interview concerning a serious crime. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 60-70. doi: 10.1002/acp.2872
- Masip, J., Herrero, C., Garrido, E., & Barba, A. (2011). Is the Behaviour Analysis Interview just common sense? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 593-604. doi:10.1002/acp.1728
- Masip, J., Martínez, C., Blandón-Gitlin, I., Sánchez, N., Herrero, C., & Ibabe, I. (2018). Learning to detect deception from evasive answers and inconsistencies across repeated interviews: A study with lay respondents and police officers. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2207. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02207
- Masip, J., & Sánchez, N. (2019). How people really suspect lies: A re examination of Novotny et al.’s (2018) data. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 43, 481-492. doi:0.1007/s10919-019-00309-y
- Masip, J., Sporer, S. L., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the Reality Monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 99-121. doi: 10.1080/10683160410001726356
- Nahari, G., Ashkenazi, T., Fisher, R. P., Granhag, P.-A., Hershkowitz, I., Masip, J., Meijer, E. H., Nisin, Z., Sarid, N., Taylor, P. J., Verschuere, B., & Vrij, A. (2019). “Language of Lies”: Urgent issues and prospects in verbal lie detection research. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 24, 1-23. doi:10.1111/lcrp.1214
- Sambrano, D., Masip, J., Blandón-Gitlin, I. (2021). How emotions affect judgment and decision making in an interrogation scenario. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 26, 62-82. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12181
- Sánchez, N., & Masip, J. (2020). Do people detect deception the way they think they do? Replication and extensions. Psicothema, 32, 329-336. doi:10.7334/psicothema2019.405
- Sporer, S. L., Manzanero, A. L., & Masip, J. (2021). Optimizing CBCA and RM research: Recommendations for analyzing and reporting data on content cues to deception. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 27, 1-39. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2020.1757097
- Street, C. N. H., & Masip, J. (2015). The source of the truth bias: Heuristic processing? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56, 254-263. doi:10.1111/sjop.12204
Other Publications:
- Masip, J., Garrido, E., Herrero, C., Antón, C., & Alonso, H. (2006). Officers as lie detectors. Guilty before charged. In D. Chadee & J. Young (Eds.), Current themes in social psychology (pp. 187-205). Mona, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.
- Street, C. N. H., Masip, J., & Kenny, M. (2019). Understanding lie detection biases with the Adaptive Lie Detector Theory (ALIED): A boundedly rational approach. In T. Docan-Morgan (Ed.), Palgrave handbook of deceptive communication (pp. 227-247). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_12
Courses Taught:
- Psychology and Law
Jaume Masip, Ph.D.
Facultad de Psicología
University of Salamanca
Avda. de la Merced, 109-131
37005 Salamanca
Spain
- Phone: Int + 34 677 555496